Legal Opinion

State v. Smith

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided February 21, 1984No. 8316SC547PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VAUGHN, Chief Judge.

Defendant first contends that the trial court erred when it denied defendant’s motion to dismiss under the Speedy Trial Act. G.S. 15A-701, et seq. We find no error.

G.S. 15A-701(al)l provides that the trial of a criminal defendant shall begin within 120 days from the date defendant is arrested, served with criminal process, waives an indictment, or is indicted, whichever occurs last. The indictment in this case, returned on 22 February 1982, triggered the 120 day period. Defendant showed that the time between the indictment and trial was more than 120 days: Defendant was…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. State v. FulcherSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  3. State v. OliverSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  4. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  5. State v. ThompsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State v. JohnsonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1988
  2. State v. BoykinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  3. State v. TriptowUtah Supreme Court · 1989
  4. State v. HensleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  5. United States v. CarrCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2010

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API