State v. Edmondson
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
ARNOLD, Judge.
Defendant first contends that the trial court erred in allowing the jury to convict him of both felonious breaking or entering, N.C. Gen. Stat. § 14-54(a) (1981), and felonious larceny pursuant to a breaking or entering, N.C. Gen. Stat. § 14-72(b) (1981). Defendant reasons that felonious breaking or entering is a lesser-in- eluded offense of felonious larceny, and therefore that he cannot be convicted of and punished for both.
The test for determining whether one offense is a lesser-included offense of another so as to prevent conviction for both was set out by the United States…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Prince v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- State v. ThompsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- State v. JacksonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. JellsOhio Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. HensleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
- State v. CobbCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
- State v. RichardsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
- State v. CameronCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.