Legal Opinion

State v. Flagg

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1865PublishedCited by 9 opinions

APPEAL from the Union Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtRat, J.

Indictment for perjury. Motion to-quash sustained. The charge is, that the defendant did, in a certain action pending in court against him, “on a motion to continue said above mentioned cause of action, upon his corporal oath, said oath having' been then and there administered by,” &c., “make the following affidavit, to-wit:” &c. The affidavit was to the truth of certain statements, and accompanied interrogatories‘filed to the plaintiffs. Our statute provides, 2 G-. & H., § 40, p. 450, that the false swearing must be “touching a matter material to the point *244in question.” - The indictment does…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. HallIndiana Supreme Court · 1844

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. AndersonIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  2. State v. SuttonIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Bell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1914
  4. Shevalier v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1909
  5. State v. BolandMissouri Court of Appeals · 1882

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API