State v. Sutton
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Montgomery Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtHoward, J.
The appellee was indicted for perjury, and on his motion the indictment was quashed. It is claimed by the State that this ruling was erroneous.
It appears from the indictment that the appellee had been a witness in an action brought by one McBroom against the Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Company for damages alleged to *159have been sustained by the killing of McBroom’s colt. A material issue in said action was the value of the colt, and appellee gave evidence as to such value.
The evidence alleged to be false had reference to the competency of the appellee as an expert…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Galloway v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1868
- State v. AndersonIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- State v. SchultzIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
- Hendricks v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1866
- State v. HuntIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Cutler v. Territory of OklahomaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1899
- State v. TurleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1899
- State v. MillerSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1904
- State v. KellisIndiana Supreme Court · 1923
- Maddox v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1938
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.