Bell v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
PRENDERGAST, Presiding Judge.
—Appellant was indicted and convicted of perjury. In view of the grounds of the motion to quash the indictment it is necessary to give a substantial copy of it.
It has the usual necessary preliminary allegations as to the court, the organization of the grand jury, etc., and that appellant on or about October 24, 1913, in said State and county, at a regular term of said court, naming the presiding judge, appeared before the said grand jury of said court at that time after it had been duly and legally organized, empaneled, etc., with a certain person as foreman,…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Wood v. . People of the State of N.Y.New York Court of Appeals · 1874
- Ex Parte MuncyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1913
- McMurtry v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1898
- Galloway v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1868
- Campell v. PeopleNew York Supreme Court · 1832
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Burleson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1968
- Carter v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1940
- Highsaw v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1921
- Adamson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1921
- Bell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1921
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.