Knight v. State
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the CourtHarrell, J.
These two otherwise unconnected cases, Sirbaugh v. State, No. 94, September Term 2003, and Knight v. State, No. 93, September Term 2003, each present the question of whether an interrogating officer’s assumedly truthful promise to a criminal suspect to report to the prosecuting authority that the suspect cooperated with an investigation is an improper inducement that renders a subsequent statement by that suspect involuntary under Maryland non-constitutional law and, therefore, inadmissible at trial.
Petitioner Steven Daniel Sirbaugh was told by police officers that if he cooperated during a…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Hillard v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1979
- Remsburg v. MontgomeryCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
- Cartnail v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
- Ball v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Lee v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2011
- Gorge v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
- Hill v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2011
- Lan Buck v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2008
- Cooper v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2005
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.