Legal Opinion

Cooper v. State

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided July 6, 2005No. 1353, September Term, 2003PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarbera, J.

This murder case involves application of the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Missouri v. Seibert, 542 U.S. 600, 124 S.Ct. 2601, 159 L.Ed.2d 643 (2004). With Seibert, the Court reinforced the protections afforded by Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966). Miranda, of course, held that a custodial confession obtained without benefit of proper warnings and waiver of the rights to silence and representation by counsel is generally barred from use by the State at trial.

In Seibert, the Supreme Court struck down the two-step, “question first” interrogation strategy…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Brown v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Caldwell v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Ferguson v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2008
  2. Lan Buck v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2008
  3. Hoerauf v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2008
  4. McCain v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2010
  5. Edwards v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API