Legal Opinion
Bennett v. Schooley
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Pennsylvania
Decided November 18, 1896PublishedCited by 4 opinions
Sur Application for Leave to File a Supplemental Bill in the Nature of a Bill of Review.
1Opinion of the Court
BUFFINGTON, District Judge.
This is an application by the respondent for leave to file a supplemental bill, in the nature of a bill of review. There has been a hearing upon proofs; opinion filed; decree entered, adjudging complainants’ patent valid, and that respondent had infringed certain claims; and a reference to a special master for accounting. The alleged ground for the present application is after-discovered evidence, namely, United Slates patent No. 273,441, granted March 6, 1883, to J. H. Bevington, and English patent No. 2,908, granted in 18(57 to Marmadulce Wilkin and John W. Clark,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Baker v. WhitingUnited States Circuit Court · 1840
- Page v. Holmes Burglar Alarm Telegraph Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1880
- Hitchcock v. TremaineU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1872
- Reeves v. Keystone Bridge Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania · 1876
3Cited by4 opinions
- Eclipse Mach. Co. v. Harley-Davidson Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1923
- Wm. Goldman Theatres, Inc. v. Loew's, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1947
- Moneyweight Scale Co. v. Toledo Computing Scale Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1912
- Chester N. Weaver, Inc. v. American Chain Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1925