Page v. Holmes Burglar Alarm Telegraph Co.
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York
1Opinion of the CourtBlatchford, C. J.
In this case a decision has been filed sustaining the validity of the patent sued on as respects its eleventh, twelfth and thirteenth claims, and holding that the defendant has infringed those claims by making and selling telegraph burglar alarms, in which a circuit breaker acts automatically to break the circuit, so that by the movement of an armatur to and from an electro-magnet a bell is rapidly struck by a hammer, and which alarms contain the inventions covered by said three claims.
The defendant now, before the usual interlocutory decree in favor of the plaintiff is entered, presents to…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Walden v. BodleySupreme Court of the United States · 1840
- Baker v. WhitingUnited States Circuit Court · 1840
3Cited by13 opinions
- Missouri-Kansas Pipe Line Co. v. WarrickSupreme Court of Delaware · 1938
- Flint & P. M. R. Co. v. Marine Ins.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Michigan · 1895
- Schmertz Wire Glass Co. v. Western Glass Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the Northern District of Illnois · 1910
- Societe Anonyme du Filtre Chamberland Systeme Pasteur v. AllenU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern Ohio · 1897
- Colgate v. Western Union Tel. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1884
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.