Hitchcock v. Tremaine
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York
[Bill in equity by Alonzo Hitchcock and others against Charles M. Tremaine and William B. Tremaine.] 2 [This was a petition by the defendants to stay the entry of a final decree, in the suit Hitchcock v. Tremaine [Case No. 6,538], and for leave to file an amended answer, and to take proof in support thereof, and for a rehearing of the cause.]
1Opinion of the Court
BLATCHFORD, District Judge.
The grounds set forth in the petition, for the relief asked, are: (1.) That the defendants did not have proper expert testimony on the first hearing; (2.) That they have discovered, since the first hearing, that a patent issued to one Louis, prior to the plaintiffs’, and set up in their answer as anticipating it, has been twice reissued, one of such reissues having been granted since the first hearing; (3.) That, since the first hearing, they have learn*247ed that said Louis was the inventor of the identical device covered by the plaintiffs’ patent, and made and sold…
2Cited by11 opinions
- Eclipse Mach. Co. v. Harley-Davidson Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1923
- Wm. Goldman Theatres, Inc. v. Loew's, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1947
- Colgate v. Western Union Tel. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1884
- Bennett v. SchooleyU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Pennsylvania · 1896
- Taigman v. ForsbergCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1915
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.