Beintema v. State
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
MACY, Justice.
Appellant Paul Beintema appeals from his conviction for delivery of marihuana.
We affirm.
ISSUES
Appellant presents the following issues for our review:
I. Was the Defendant denied effective assistance of counsel as guaranteed by the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution?
II. Were the prosecutor’s statements during opening and questioning of the State’s two witnesses regarding prior bad acts plain error requiring reversal?
FACTS
On December 23, 1994, a Gillette police officer responded to a report involving a runaway. During his investigation, the police officer came into…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Frias v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1986
- Crozier v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1986
- Dickeson v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1992
- Bradley v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1981
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Gleason v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2002
- Gayler v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1998
- Proffit v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2008
- Cazier v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2006
- Rigler v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1997
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.