Legal Opinion

Beintema v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided April 23, 1997No. 96-147PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MACY, Justice.

Appellant Paul Beintema appeals from his conviction for delivery of marihuana.

We affirm.

ISSUES

Appellant presents the following issues for our review:

I. Was the Defendant denied effective assistance of counsel as guaranteed by the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution?

II. Were the prosecutor’s statements during opening and questioning of the State’s two witnesses regarding prior bad acts plain error requiring reversal?

FACTS

On December 23, 1994, a Gillette police officer responded to a report involving a runaway. During his investigation, the police officer came into…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Frias v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Crozier v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Dickeson v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Bradley v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1981

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Gleason v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Gayler v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Proffit v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Cazier v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Rigler v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1997

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API