Legal Opinion

State v. Scheuerman

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 14, 2022No. 122253PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS No. 122,253 STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, v. ROBERT CASH SCHEUERMAN, Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. The most fundamental rule of statutory construction is that the intent of the Legislature governs if that intent can be ascertained. This assessment begins with the plain language of the statute, giving common words their ordinary meaning. When a statute is plain and unambiguous, an appellate court should not speculate about the legislative intent behind that clear language. If a statute's language is ambiguous, a court will consult the canons of…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. California v. AcevedoSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Minnesota v. CarterSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. Murdaugh v. LivingstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  4. Byrd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2018
  5. State v. PlummerSupreme Court of Kansas · 2012

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Schmidt v. Trademark, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2022
  2. City of Wichita v. TrotterSupreme Court of Kansas · 2022
  3. State v. MoraSupreme Court of Kansas · 2022
  4. State v. ValdezSupreme Court of Kansas · 2022
  5. State v. RuizSupreme Court of Kansas · 2023

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API