Legal Opinion

State v. Valdez

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 1, 2022No. 121053PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS No. 121,053 STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, v. JOSEPH MIGUEL VALDEZ, Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. Under our four-part framework for analyzing jury instruction claims, a defendant's failure to object at trial does not prevent appellate review—it simply requires a higher degree of prejudice to be shown for reversal. 2. A rebuttable presumption has a different legal effect than a permissive inference. 3. In general, an appellate court will not address an issue raised for the first time on appeal, although there are limited exceptions. An appellate…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Holloway v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. County Court of Ulster Cty. v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. State v. WardSupreme Court of Kansas · 2011
  4. State v. PlummerSupreme Court of Kansas · 2012
  5. State v. HoltSupreme Court of Kansas · 2014

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. GuebaraSupreme Court of Kansas · 2024
  2. State v. BerkstresserSupreme Court of Kansas · 2022
  3. State v. PetersSupreme Court of Kansas · 2024
  4. State v. FordSupreme Court of Kansas · 2025
  5. State v. GarrettCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2026

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API