Legal Opinion

State v. Mora

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided May 20, 2022No. 123410PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS No. 123,410 STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, v. TANNER SCOTT MORA, Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. In prosecutions for an attempted crime—when the statute defining the crime does not include an attempt as a means of violating that statute—the default rule in K.S.A. 2020 Supp. 21-5301(a) requires the State to prove the defendant had the specific intent to commit the intended crime, even if that crime as a completed crime does not require specific intent. 2. A defendant prosecuted under an aiding and abetting theory for a specific intent crime—including…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. State v. WardSupreme Court of Kansas · 2011
  2. State v. EngelhardtSupreme Court of Kansas · 2005
  3. United States v. SayetsittyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
  4. State v. LogsdonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2016
  5. State v. BetancourtSupreme Court of Kansas · 2014

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. MendezSupreme Court of Kansas · 2024
  2. State v. GomezSupreme Court of Kansas · 2025
  3. In re N.E.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2022
  4. State v. StuartSupreme Court of Kansas · 2024
  5. State v. PalmerSupreme Court of Kansas · 2025

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API