Legal Opinion
Disabled in Action v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided February 16, 2011No. 09-3964PublishedCited by 49 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
FUENTES, Circuit Judge.
Disabled in Action of Pennsylvania (“DIA”) has filed suit claiming that the Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority (“SEPTA”)’s failure to make certain portions of its facilities accessible to individuals with disabilities after undertaking construction work at those facilities violated the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101, et seq. (“ADA”), and the Rehabilitation Act, 29 U.S.C. § 794, et seq. (“RA”). On appeal from the District Court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of DIA, SEPTA argues that certain regulations…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Provident Tradesmens Bank & Trust Co. v. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Finberg v. SullivanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
- Disabled in Action of Pennsylvania v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
- Ruehl v. Viacom, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- National Security Systems, Inc. v. IolaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012
- Mt. Holly Gardens Citizens in Action, Inc. v. Township of Mount HollyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011
- Rodriguez v. Barrita, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2014
- US Airways, Inc. v. McCutchenCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011
- Hip Heightened Independence an v. Port Authority of New York andCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.