Legal Opinion
Mt. Holly Gardens Citizens in Action, Inc. v. Township of Mount Holly
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided September 13, 2011No. 11-1159PublishedCited by 67 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
FUENTES, Circuit Judge.
Mount Holly Township (the “Township”) has proposed a redevelopment plan that would eliminate the existing homes in its Gardens neighborhood, occupied predominantly by low-income residents, and replace them with significantly more expensive housing units. Appellants, an association of Gardens residents organized under the name Mt. Holly Gardens Citizens in Action, and 23 current and former residents of the neighborhood (collectively the “Residents”) filed suit against the Township alleging violations of various anti-discrimination laws.
Before the…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Griggs v. Duke Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Havens Realty Corp. v. ColemanSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- J. I. Case Co. v. BorakSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Hazelwood School District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- US Airways, Inc. v. BarnettSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by67 opinions
- Mhany Management, Inc. v. County of NassauCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2016
- John Rodriguez v. Natl City BankCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2013
- Liana Revock v. Cowpet Bay West Condominium AsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017
- De Reyes v. Waples Mobile Home Park Ltd. P'shipCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2018
- Avenue 6E Investments, LLC v. City of YumaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.