Legal Opinion

Wehunt v. Pritchett

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided October 10, 1951No. 17577PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Atkinson, Presiding Justice.

(After stating the foregoing facts.) The written contract sought to be specifically performed in count one contained the clause: “This contract is conditioned upon the final consummation of the sale of property known as 605 Spencer Street, East Point, Georgia, as per contract secured by Tucker Realty Co.” While it is alleged that the petitioner was the owner of the Spencer Street property, and that the provision regarding its sale was put into the contract for his benefit alone, nevertheless, the obligations in the sales contract were not mutually binding in that,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Shropshire v. RaineySupreme Court of Georgia · 1920
  2. Hall v. WingateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1924
  3. Coleman v. Woodland Hills CompanySupreme Court of Georgia · 1943
  4. Redmond v. Sinclair Refining Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1949
  5. Hollingsworth v. Peoples BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1934

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. F & C INVESTMENT COMPANY v. JonesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1954
  2. West v. DownerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1962
  3. Tuggle v. WilsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1981
  4. Jinright v. RussellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1971
  5. Ex Parte PayneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1999

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API