Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Payne

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided September 10, 1999No. 1980062PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Keisha Payne, the defendant in an action pending in the Lee Circuit Court, petitions for a writ of mandamus directing the circuit court to vacate its order compelling arbitration of Payne's counterclaims against the plaintiff, Jay Pontiac GMC Truck Mitsubishi, Inc. ("Jay Pontiac"). We grant the petition.

I

On March 7, 1997, Payne, a resident of Auburn, Alabama, visited Jay Pontiac at its principal place of business in Columbus, Georgia.1 Payne negotiated with a Jay Pontiac salesman for the purchase of a new 1997 Pontiac Grand Am automobile and for financing for that purchase. Payne and a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Ex Parte EdgarSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  3. Ex Parte McKinneySupreme Court of Alabama · 1987
  4. Ex Parte Conference America, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1998
  5. Ex Parte AlexanderSupreme Court of Alabama · 1990

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Drummond Co. v. Walter Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2006
  2. Premiere Chevrolet, Inc. v. HeadrickSupreme Court of Alabama · 1999
  3. Celtic Life Ins. Co. v. McLendonSupreme Court of Alabama · 2001
  4. Thompson v. Lithia Chrysler Jeep DodgeMontana Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Credit Sales, Inc. v. CrimmSupreme Court of Alabama · 2001

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API