Legal Opinion

Hollingsworth v. Peoples Bank

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided November 15, 1934No. 10112PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBell, J.

(After stating the foregoing facts.)

Hnder the provisions of the Civil Code of 1910, § 6149, par. 4, 5, it is the duty of this court to require the clerk of the court below to transmit a copy of any additional portion of the record which appears to be necessary to a determination of a case, whether or not the same be specified in the bill of exceptions. In the instant case the clerk of the trial court, without previous order *709from this court, certified and transmitted a copy of the proceedings whereby a new party defendant was added in the court below. Under the facts, this additional…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Morrow v. Southern Express Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1897
  2. East Atlanta Land Co. v. MowerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1912
  3. Georgia Northern Railway Co. v. Hutchins & JenkinsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  4. Brown v. BowmanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  5. Hall v. WingateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1924

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Benefield v. MaloneCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
  2. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. ClarkeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
  3. Smyth v. Kaspar American State BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Wehunt v. PritchettSupreme Court of Georgia · 1951
  5. Teague v. Adair Realty & Loan Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1955

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API