Legal Opinion
Dayton Superior Corp. v. Yan
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided November 29, 2012No. 3:12-cv-380PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ENTRY AND ORDER DENYING KLO-VER’S AND EPCO’S MOTION TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF PERSONAL JURISDICTION (Doc. # 17) AND DENYING KLOVER’S AND EPCO’S MOTION TO TRANSFER VENUE (Doc. # 17)
THOMAS M. ROSE, District Judge.
Plaintiff Dayton Superior Corp. (“Superi- or”) brings this action against Defendants Epoxy Products Company, LLC (“EPCO”), Julian Yan (‘Yan”) and Michael Klover (“Klover”) based upon their misappropriation of trade secrets and confidential and proprietary information in violation of Ohio law and contractual obligations. On November 13, 2012, this Court restrained Yan, Klover and EPCO from…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Southern MacHine Company, Inc. v. Mohasco Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1968
- Continental Grain Co. v. Barge FBL-585Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Compuserve, Incorporated v. Richard S. Patterson, Individually, and Flashpoint DevelopmentCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- DRFP, LLC v. Republica Bolivariana de VenezuelaDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2013
- Custom Conveyor Corp. v. HydeDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2017
- A.B. Pratt & Co v. Bridgeport Group, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2023
- Aerodyne Environmental, Inc. v. Keirton, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2022
- Afiniti, Ltd. v. ChishtiDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2026
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.