Legal Opinion

Aerodyne Environmental, Inc. v. Keirton, Inc.

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided September 15, 2022No. 1:22-cv-00118Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION AERODYNE ENVIRONMENTAL, ) Case No. 1:22-cv-0118 INC., ) ) Judge J. Philip Calabrese Plaintiff, ) ) Magistrate Judge v. ) Jonathan D. Greenberg ) KEIRTON, INC., et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ) OPINION AND ORDER In April 2022, Plaintiff Aerodyne Environmental, Inc., amended its complaint and added SIDMAC Engineering & Manufacturing, Inc. as a defendant. (ECF No. 60.) Plaintiff alleges that SIDMAC misappropriated its trade secrets by reverse- engineering Plaintiff’s proprietary horizontal cyclones and manufacturing the alleged…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Daimler AG v. BaumanSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
  5. Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S. A. v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 2011

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API