Legal Opinion

People v. Kemp

New York Court of Appeals

Decided December 2, 1999PublishedCited by 543 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

The day after denial of his motion to suppress physical evidence, defendant pleaded guilty to attempted criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree (Penal Law §§ 110.00, 220.39 [1]). As a condition to the People’s agreement to the plea and the court’s acceptance of it, and in exchange for a promised sentence of four to eight years imprisonment, defendant waived his right to appeal the conviction and sentence. He allocuted accordingly at his plea before the court. Nevertheless, defendant…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. HidalgoNew York Court of Appeals · 1998
  2. People v. MoissettNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
  3. People v. MunizNew York Court of Appeals · 1998
  4. People v. WilliamsNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  5. People v. BrayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989

3Cited by543 opinions

  1. The People v. Rasaun SandersNew York Court of Appeals · 2015
  2. People v. WlasiukAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  3. People v. MilesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  4. People v. JohnsonNew York Court of Appeals · 2025
  5. People v. GrahamAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010

538 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API