Legal Opinion

Reed v. Howerton Engineering Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 21, 1924PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClarkson, J.

Tbe first contention cannot be sustained. Article VII, section 7, of tbe State Constitution, is as follows:

“No county, city, town or other municipal corporation shall contract any debt, pledge its faith or loan its credit, nor shall any tax be levied or collected by any officers of the same except for the necessary expenses thereof, unless by a vote of the majority of the qualified voters therein.”

This Court has uniformly held that a sewer system was a necessary expense within the meaning of the Constitution, and unless so prescribed by the Legislature, a vote of the majority of the qualified…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Butchers' Benevolent Ass'n v. Crescent City Live-Stock Landing & Slaughter-House Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1873
  2. Palmer v. StumphIndiana Supreme Court · 1868
  3. Person v. DoughtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
  4. Smith v. School Trustees.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  5. Cain v. Commissioners of Davie CountySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1882

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. McIntyre v. ClarksonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  2. State v. . DixonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  3. State v. DixonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  4. Calcutt v. . McGeachySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  5. City of Asheville v. StateCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API