Legal Opinion
Simpson's Case
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided May 18, 1949PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMuechie, J.
The propriety of the decision of the Industrial Accident Commission, referred to hereafter as the “Commission,” under review, on this appeal of the defendants from a pro forma decree of the Superior Court entered pursuant thereto, must be determined by construing the second and closing sentence of the first paragraph of Section 9 of The Workmen’s Compensation Act, referred to hereafter as the “Act,” as it was effective at the time of the industrial accident to which the proceedings relate, November 21, 1941, R. S., 1930, Chap. 55. The controlling language is:
“The amount of such services and…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Industrial Commission v. HammondSupreme Court of Colorado · 1925
- Petraska v. National Acme Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1921
- Morris v. Laughlin Chevrolet Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- Meuse's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930
- Melcher's CaseSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1926
3Cited by9 opinions
- A. G. Crunkleton Electric Co. v. BarkdollCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1962
- Delano v. City of South PortlandSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979
- Simpson v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation ProgramsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1982
- Gordon v. Maine Reduction Company, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1976
- Donald J. Simpson v. Director, Office Of Workers' Compensation ProgramsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1982
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.