Legal Opinion

Petraska v. National Acme Co.

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided May 3, 1921PublishedCited by 25 opinions

Appeal from an award of the Commissioner' of Industries, Windsor County, allowing the claimant compensation for injuries received while in the employ of the defendant National Acme Company. , The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the CourtSlack, J.

The defendants appeal from the award of the Commissioner of Industries allowing the claimant compensation for injuries received while in the’ employ of the defendant National Acme Company, and move to dismiss the proceedings on the ground that the commissioner did not have jurisdiction to hear and determine the same; it not appearing that the claimant made, claim for compensation as required by law, or that the defend-' ants made voluntary payments of compensation on- account of such injuries.

G-. L. 5796 provides: “A proceeding under the provisions of this chapter for compensation shall no't…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Bushnell v. Industrial BoardIllinois Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Kent v. Town of LincolnSupreme Court of Vermont · 1860
  3. Levangie's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
  4. Murphy's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
  5. Ohio Oil Co v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1920

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. United States Casualty Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1926
  2. Shields v. Vermont Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Vermont · 1929
  3. Bosquet v. Howe Scale Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1923
  4. Matter of PaquetteSupreme Court of Vermont · 1942
  5. Moleske v. MacDonaldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1929

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API