Legal Opinion

Morris v. Laughlin Chevrolet Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 17, 1940PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClarkson, J.

N. C. Code, 1939 (Michie), sec. 8081 (ww) (Public Laws 1929, ch. 120, sec. 41), is as follows: “The total compensation payable under this article (act) shall in no case exceed Six Thousand ($6,000) Dollars.” Do the words “total compensation” include money paid by the employer or carrier for medical, hospitalization, doctors, nurses and drugs for the employee? We think not.

In Arp v. Wood & Co., 207 N. C., 41, it is held: “The amount allowed by the Industrial Commission for serious facial or head disfigurement is to be included with other amounts allowed an injured employee in determining the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Baltimore & Phila. Steamboat Co. v. NortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Kearney v. . VannSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
  3. Millwood v. Firestone Cotton MillsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  4. Thompson v. Virginia & Carolina Southern RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  5. Arp v. E. A. Wood & Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1934

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Hyler v. GTE Products Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1993
  2. State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission v. EdmistenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  3. Deese v. Southeastern Lawn and Tree Expert Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  4. Ashley v. Rent-A-Car CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  5. Whitted v. . Palmer-Bee Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1948

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API