Legal Opinion
A. G. Crunkleton Electric Co. v. Barkdoll
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided January 23, 1962No. [No. 125, September Term, 1961.]PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMarbury, J.
Albert E. Barkdoll, claimant and appellee, was employed by the appellant, A. G. Crunkleton Electric Company, Inc. On November 26, 1951, Barkdoll, during the course of his employment, sustained fourth and fifth degree burns on both arms and as a result of these injuries had to undergo a bilateral amputation. Each arm was amputated about four inches below the shoulder.
He was hospitalized for a long period of time following this accident, both for treatment and attempted rehabilitation. For approximately two years after the accident he was furnished, with nursing services. By way of workmen’s…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Lahti v. FosterlingMichigan Supreme Court · 1959
- Congressional School of Aeronautics, Inc. v. State Roads CommissionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
- Graf v. Montgomery Ward & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
- Rumple v. Henry H. Meyer Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1955
- Gibson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1954
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Breitenbach v. N.B. Handy Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
- President of Georgetown College v. MaddenDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1980
- Kushay v. Sexton Dairy Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1975
- Talas v. Correct Piping Co., Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1982
- R & T Construction Co. v. JudgeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1991
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.