Legal Opinion
Doyle v. Planned Parenthood of Seattle-King County, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided January 18, 1982No. 8480-1-IPublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCallow, J.
Donna Doyle appeals from a Superior Court order granting summary judgment to the defendants and refusing to permit amendment of her complaint to assert a strict products liability claim. The primary issue is whether her claims against two of the defendants are outlawed by the passing of the period of the statutes of limitation.
On May 19, 1969, Doyle contacted Planned Parenthood of Seattle-King County, Inc. and sought advice regarding contraceptives. She was examined by Dr. Julius Butler and fitted with a Majzlin Spring intrauterine device (IUD). Planned Parenthood did not charge for either…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Brown v. MacPherson's, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1975
- Waldman v. RohrbaughCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1966
- Samuelson v. FreemanWashington Supreme Court · 1969
- Hotelling v. WaltherOregon Supreme Court · 1942
- Hoven v. KelbleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Ino Ino, Inc. v. City of BellevueWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- Ino Ino, Inc. v. City of BellevueWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- Austin v. LitvakSupreme Court of Colorado · 1984
- Colton v. DeweyNebraska Supreme Court · 1982
- Denny's Restaurants, Inc. v. Security Union Title InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1993
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.