Legal Opinion
Waldman v. Rohrbaugh
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided January 7, 1966No. [No. 100, September Term, 1965.]PublishedCited by 101 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHammond, J.
The appellant, plaintiff below, on September 2, 1964, sued at law to recover damages from his former doctor for, in the words of his brief, “malpractice through negligence in the conduct of an operation performed on plaintiff by defendant on June 16, 1961 and alleging continuing malpractice through negligence thereafter in the care and treatment of plaintiff following this operation.” The operation and treatment were to cure or alleviate a fracture of the ankle. Counsel for the doctor filed a plea that he did not commit the wrongs alleged and a plea of limitations stating that the cause of…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Urie v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Borgia v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1962
- Ayers v. MorganSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
- Fernandi v. StrullySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1961
- Huysman v. KirschCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by101 opinions
- Gaddis v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1967
- Berry v. BrannerOregon Supreme Court · 1966
- Flanagan v. Mount Eden General HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
- Frederick Road Ltd. Partnership v. SturmCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
- Harig v. Johns-Manville Products Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
96 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.