Legal Opinion
Brooks v. Brooks
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 8, 1941No. Civ. 13111PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMcCOMB, J.
From a judgment in favor of defendant predicated upon the sustaining of a demurrer to the complaint without leave to amend in an action to recover the consideration paid pursuant to the terms of an alleged void contract, plaintiff appeals.
The complaint alleges in substance the following:
On or about April 27, 1932, plaintiff who since 1895 had been completely paralyzed from his waist to and including his feet employed defendant as his nurse and agreed to pay her $80 per month for her services and to furnish board and room for herself and a minor son. Defendant continued as such nurse until…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Coleman v. . BurrNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
- McAllister v. DrapeauCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- Wren v. WrenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Brown v. BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
- Smith v. BachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Estate of BrooksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Ayoob v. AyoobCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- In Re Rand Mining Co.District Court, S.D. California · 1947
- Oates v. OatesWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1945
- Whittemore Homes, Inc. v. FleishmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.