Legal Opinion

Matter of Kinkead

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided February 16, 1996No. 53S00-9505-DI-508PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

The Disciplinary Commission charges that the respondent, Duncan Kinkead, improperly handled a client’s funds and failed to adequately communicate with that client, in violation of several provisions of the Rules of Professional Conduct for Attorneys at Law. The Commission and the respondent offer for our approval a Statement of Circumstances and Conditional Agreement for Discipline, entered pursuant to Ind.Admission and Discipline Rule 28, Section 11. In that agreement, the parties agree to facts underlying this matter and that a public reprimand is an appropriate disciplinary sanction. The…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Black v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  2. In re NormanIndiana Supreme Court · 1996

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Matter of BrooksIndiana Supreme Court · 1998
  2. In Re NormanIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
  3. In Re HeppenheimerIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
  4. In The Matter of Mitchell R. HeppenheimerIndiana Supreme Court · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API