In re Norman
Indiana Supreme Court
1Per curiam
On May 3, 1995, the Disciplinary Commission charged the respondent, William R. Norman, an attorney admitted to practice in this state in 1974, with neglect and other misconduct in connection with representation he provided to a client following an automobile accident. Specifically, the Commission charged that the respondent violated rules 1.2(a), 1.3, 1.4, 1.5(c), 1.8(e), and 1.16(d) of the Rules of Professional Conduct for Attorneys at Low.1 Pursuant to Ind.Admission and Discipline Rule 23, Section 11(g), the Commission and the respondent have tendered for this Court's approval a Statement…
2Cited by1 opinion
- Matter of KinkeadIndiana Supreme Court · 1996