In Re Heppenheimer
Indiana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
DISCIPLINARY ACTION
2Per curiam
The Indiana Supreme Court Disciplinary Commission charged the respondent, Mitchell R. Heppenheimer, with two counts of professional misconduct. The charges arise from his representation of a seller in a real estate transaction in which his law partner represented the buyer and from his improper deposit of client funds into his firm’s operating account.
The Commission and the respondent have tendered for this Court’s approval a Statement of Circumstances and Conditional Agreement for Discipline with respect to the charged misconduct, pursuant to Ind. Admission and Discipline…
3Cases cited4 opinions
- Matter of AnonymousIndiana Supreme Court · 1995
- Matter of RobakIndiana Supreme Court · 1995
- Matter of KinkeadIndiana Supreme Court · 1996
- Matter of LewisIndiana Supreme Court · 1997
4Cited by1 opinion
- Van Kirk v. MillerIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007