Legal Opinion

Dow v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 8, 1987No. A8210-06596; CA A35775PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtNewman, J.

Plaintiff brought an action for battery and for malicious initiation and continuation of prosecution arising out of an incident at defendant’s store. At the close of the evidence, the court directed a verdict for defendant on the claim for malicious initiation of prosecution. The jury gave defendant a verdict on the claim for malicious continuation of prosecution, but it gave plaintiff a verdict on the claim for battery and an award of $40,000 general damages and $40,000 punitive damages.

Defendant appeals the judgment for battery and assigns as errors that the court (1) refused to instruct…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Jacobs v. Tidewater Barge Lines, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Gustafson v. Payless Drug Stores Northwest, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Delp v. Zapp's Drug & Variety StoresOregon Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Wolf Ex Rel. Wolf v. Nordstrom, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Shoemaker v. SELNESOregon Supreme Court · 1960

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Fox v. OlsenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API