Legal Opinion
Fox v. Olsen
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided September 2, 1987No. 60-85-02750; CA A38137PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtNewman, J.
Petitioner appeals and respondent cross-appeals from a judgment for respondent in a filiation proceeding. Petitioner assigns as errors that the trial court granted respondent’s motion for a directed verdict and excluded blood test results from evidence. Respondent assigns as error that the court failed to award attorney fees to him. ORS 109.155(4). On the appeal, we reverse; on the cross-appeal, we affirm.
We review the evidence in the light most favorable to petitioner. Jacobs v. Tidewater Barge Lines, Inc., 277 Or 809, 562 P2d 545 (1977); Dow v. Sears Roebuck & Co., 84 Or App 664, 734 P2d…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Jacobs v. Tidewater Barge Lines, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1977
- State Ex Rel. Dickerson v. TokstadOregon Supreme Court · 1932
- Vander Veer v. Toyota Motor DistributorsOregon Supreme Court · 1978
- State Ex Rel. Farrer v. McGuireCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973
- Moore v. GruetterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. RugglesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007