Armstrong Bros. Tool Co. v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
Newman, Judge:
This is an American manufacturers’ action brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1582(b)(1970), 28 U.S.C. 2632(a) (supp. V, 1975) and 19 U.S.C. 1516(c) (supp. V, 1975), involving the Antidumping Act of 1921, as amended (19 U.S.C. 160, et seq. (1970 and supp. V, 1975)). For the background of this litigation, reference-is made to my prior opinion in Armstrong Bros. Tool Co. et al. v. United States, etc., 80 Cust. Ct. 160, C.D. 4751, modified on rehearing, 81 Cust. Ct. 162, C.R.D. 78-14 (1978).
Plaintiffs, initially by means of a request for production of documents under rule 6.4, and now by…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Kerr v. United States Dist. Court for Northern Dist. of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Environmental Protection Agency v. MinkSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Carl Zeiss Stiftung v. V. E. B. Carl Zeiss, JenaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1966
- V.E.B. Carl Zeiss, Jena, Steelmasters, Inc. And Ercona Corporation v. Ramsey Clark, Acting Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Armstrong Bros. Tool Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1979