Legal Opinion
Williams v. Upjohn Co.
District Court, S.D. Texas
Decided February 13, 1994No. Civ. A. No. H-92-2872PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
CRONE, United States Magistrate Judge.
Pending before the court is defendant The Upjohn Company’s (“Upjohn”) Motion and First Amended Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket Entries # 103 & # 140). After review of the pending motions, the affidavits and memoranda of law submitted in support, the responses, the pleadings, and.the applicable law, this court finds that defendant’s motion for summary judgment should be granted in part and denied in part.
I. Background.
Plaintiff Milton Williams (“Williams”) filed this lawsuit against Upjohn on August 26, 1992, alleging that his…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Mary Faye Skotak, George Jerry Skotak, and Eric Norman Skotak, Cross-Appellees v. Tenneco Resins, Inc., Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
- DeSantis v. Wackenhut Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1990
- Willis v. MaverickTexas Supreme Court · 1988
- Alm v. Aluminum Co. of AmericaTexas Supreme Court · 1986
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- McNeil v. WyethCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2006
- Murthy v. Abbott LaboratoriesDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2012
- Dyer v. Danek Medical, Inc.District Court, N.D. Texas · 2000
- Gerber v. Hoffmann-La Roche Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2005
- In Re Avandia Marketing, Sales Practices & Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2011
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.