Legal Opinion

Guy v. Vieth

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided June 27, 1988PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

COOPER, Justice.

This is a medical malpractice case in which the plaintiffs brought suit against five defendants for the wrongful death of their daughter. The issue presented concerns whether allegedly improper contact between the trial judge and the jury requires a reversal of the jury verdict in favor of Dr. Vieth.

There is nothing in the trial transcript to indicate any contact between the judge and the jury without the attorneys and the court reporter being present. Paragraph 6(d) of the plaintiffs’ Motion for new Trial, however, does raise the issue, as follows:

During the course of…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Andrews v. O'HEARNNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Daniels v. BloomquistSupreme Court of Iowa · 1965
  3. Texas & P. Ry. Co. v. ShortCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
  4. McKnelly v. Sperry Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1981
  5. Robert J. Cleary, by His Father and Next Friend, Mike Cleary, Sr. v. Indiana Beach, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1960

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Spencer Ex Rel. Spencer v. A-1 Crane Service, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State v. TuneCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1993
  3. Davis v. HallCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1995
  4. Godbee v. DimickCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2006
  5. In Re Estate of Gertrude Bible LinkCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2017

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API