Legal Opinion

People v. Van Eyk

California Supreme Court

Decided August 10, 1961No. Crim. 6889PublishedCited by 66 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGibson, C. J.

Defendant was indicted for conspiring to commit the crime of possession of narcotics and was found guilty by a jury. He contends that illegally obtained evidence was used in securing the conviction, that the evidence is insufficient to show the alleged conspiracy, that the court erred in instructing the jury, and that he was not brought before a magistrate within the time prescribed by law.

Officer Sanchez of the Los Angeles Police Department was the principal witness for the prosecution. He testified that an apartment occupied by Bobert Hernandez and Helen Levario was kept under surveillance…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Marron v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  2. People v. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  3. In Re DixonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Rogers v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  5. People v. BuffumCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by66 opinions

  1. People v. CockrellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  2. People v. TerryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  3. People v. UhlemannCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  4. People v. One 1960 Cadillac CoupeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
  5. People v. CarrCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972

61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API