Legal Opinion

Hyatt v. International Agricultural Corporation

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 21, 1935No. 8 Div. 587PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GARDNER, Justice.

Complainant first filed its suit at law against these three defendants seeking recovery on six promissory notes. Numerous pleas were interposed, all made exhibits to the bill. Complainant thereafter filed petition for removal of the cause to the equity docket, and, upon the same being granted, the present bill was presented.

Defendants insist the bill is without equity, and have prosecuted this appeal from the decree overruling their demurrers thereto.

The consideration for the notes was commercial fertilizer which defendants resold to the farmers. Defendants pleaded that the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Beggs v. Edison Electric Illuminating Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1892
  2. Julian v. WoolbertSupreme Court of Alabama · 1919
  3. Patton v. DardenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  4. Cleveland Storage Co. v. Guardian Trust Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1930
  5. Comer v. Birmingham News Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1928

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. McGowin v. McGowinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
  2. Electrolux Corporation v. IversonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1947
  3. Merrill v. RitchSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
  4. Camp v. Roanoke Guano Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1937
  5. Hyatt v. International Agricultural CorporationSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API