Legal Opinion

Hyatt v. International Agricultural Corporation

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 6, 1938No. 8 Div. 866Published

1Opinion of the Court

BOULDIN, Justice.

The suit was begun at law on six promissory notes, each given for a carload of commercial fertilizer, sold by plaintiff, appellee, to appellants.

The cause was, on motion of plaintiff, transferred to the equity docket. Complainant, thereupon, filed a bill in equity. The equity of this bill was considered and upheld on former appeal. Hyatt et al. v. International Agricultural Corporation, 230 Ala. 153, 160 So. 227. The present appeal is from a final decree granting complainant relief. Errors assigned to the order transferring the cause, and to the ruling on demurrer to the bill…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Walls v. Decatur Fertilizer Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1926
  2. Ala. Nat. Bank v. Parker & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1906
  3. Brown & Co. v. Adair & McCarty Bros.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1894
  4. Hyatt v. International Agricultural CorporationSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
  5. Kirby v. Huntsville Fertilizer & Milling Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1894

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API