Legal Opinion

Camp v. Roanoke Guano Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 2, 1937No. 5 Div. 256PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOSTER, Justice.

The bill in this case seeks a discovery and accounting by a principal against his alleged agent. It alleges an agency agreement by which respondent agreed to sell fertilizers to consumers as agent for complainant, and to make collections for such sales and remit the amounts so collected to complainant. It does not allege whether the contract of agency was in writing or whether there was any consideration to the agent.

It is consistent with the bill to assume that the contract was verbal and without consideration.

The bill then alleges that respondent as such agent sold a large…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Meyerson v. New Idea Hosiery Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1927
  2. Phillipps v. Birmingham Industrial Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1909
  3. Dorrough v. Mt. Pleasant Fertilizer Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1924
  4. Hyatt v. International Agricultural CorporationSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Brunel v. Nashua Building & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1949
  2. Electrolux Corporation v. IversonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1947
  3. Nye v. LovelaceDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API