Legal Opinion

Merrill v. Ritch

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 2, 1937No. 4 Div. 975PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GARDNER, Justice.

Complainant to this bill is landlord of defendant in a storehouse in Dothan undergoing certain repairs. Defendant tenant, insisting his stock of merchandise was damaged in this repair work by dust, dirt, and the like, instituted a suit at law against complainant, his landlord, to recover damages therefor. Thereupon, this bill was filed seeking to have the controversy determined in equity court resting for its equity upon the theory of an accounting and discovery.

Upon the theory of an accounting there must be averment of facts sufficient to show that complete relief cannot be…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Carpenter v. WinnSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  2. Cullman Property Co. v. H. H. Hitt Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1917
  3. Continental Life Insurance v. WebbSupreme Court of Alabama · 1875
  4. Gayle v. PenningtonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1914
  5. Va. & Ala. Mining & Manufacturing Co. v. Hale & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1890

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Martin Stamping & Stove Co. v. ManleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1953
  2. Young v. DeanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1950
  3. Meyrovitz v. WatfordSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
  4. Van Valkenburgh v. HoldenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API