Legal Opinion

Gembolis v. Rydeski

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 6, 1932No. Docket No. 57, Calendar No. 36,222PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtButzel, J.

Helen Gembolis, as administratrix of the estate of her husband, Anton, brought suit under the death act (3 Comp. Laws 1929, §§ 14061, 14062) against Roman Rydeski, the driver, and Ted Rydeski, the owner, of an automobile that struck Anton Gembolis and caused his instant death, between 5:30 and 6:00 p. m. on October 27, 1930. Roman Rydeski was driving in an easterly direction over the old county road that runs from Bessemer to Wakefield, Michigan. Gembolis, a miner, was walking in the same direction while returning home for his evening meal. He had reached a point just beyond the bridge in the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Ruth v. VroomMichigan Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Petersen v. LundinMichigan Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Elrich v. SchwadererMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Bielecki v. United Trucking ServiceMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Wilkins v. BradfordMichigan Supreme Court · 1929

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Schillinger v. WymanMichigan Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Barry v. ElkinMichigan Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Rytkonen v. City of WakefieldMichigan Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Peck v. HampelMichigan Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Zolton v. RotterMichigan Supreme Court · 1948

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API