Legal Opinion

Barry v. Elkin

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 6, 1952No. Docket 8, Calendar 45,020PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBushnell, J.

In this action, in which trial by jury was waived, plaintiff Ruth W. Barry, administratrix of the estate of George A. Barry, deceased, sought to .recover damages resulting from the claimed negligence of defendant Maurice J. Elkin. At the conclusion of plaintiff’s proofs, defendant asked for judgment of no cause of action because of plaintiff’s.failure to produce any proof of actionable negligence. The motion was granted and plaintiff has appealed from the judgment.

At about 1:15 p.m. on November 19, 1947, police officers attached to the Accident Prevention Bureau were called to investigate an…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Adams v. Iron Cliffs Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Frye v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Malone v. ViningMichigan Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Blair v. Seitner Dry Goods Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Fish v. Grand Trunk Western RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1936

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Kaminski v. Grand Trunk Western RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Gunlock v. New Frontier Hotel Corp.Nevada Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Judis v. Borg-Warner CorporationMichigan Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Roundhouse v. Owens-Illinois, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1979
  5. Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance Exchange v. PoweMichigan Supreme Court · 1957

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API