Legal Opinion

Mitchell v. Burt & Gordon, P.C. (In Re Stein)

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided April 21, 1997No. 392-33885-S7, Adversary No. 92-3112-S, Civil No. 93-438-FRPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

FRYE, Judge.

The matters before the court are the resolutions of claims for relief one, four, five and six and the remedy under claim for relief two.

The following constitutes findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Rule 52 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

BACKGROUND

This is an adversary proceeding in which the trustee in bankruptcy, John H. Mitchell, seeks to recover property for the bankruptcy estate of the debtor, Alexander Y. Stein, punitive damages, attorney fees, and costs. The trustee in bankruptcy sets forth six claims for relief…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lytle v. Payette-Oregon Slope Irrigation DistrictOregon Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Nelson v. HansenOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Burt & Gordon v. SteinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
  4. Shook v. Vonder HaarCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In Re SteinDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1999
  2. In Re Suncoast Towers East AssociatesUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. · 1999
  3. Mitchell v. Burt, Vetterlein & Bushnell, P. C.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  4. Stringer v. Mitchell (In Re Stein)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Oregon · 2001
  5. Glimcher Supermall Venture, LLC v. Coleman Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2007

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API