Legal Opinion

Shook v. Vonder Haar

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 26, 1995No. 902029; CA A83890PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, J.

Defendant appeals from a judgment of strict foreclosure in an action to foreclose a land-sale contract. He objects on appeal to the trial court’s decision to include in the judgment interest owed on the contract during a period in which the contract had been foreclosed pursuant to a prior judgment. We affirm.

Plaintiff sold defendant a house and certain personal property in Tillamook County under a contract dated May 27, 1988. The sale price was $85,000, of which defendant paid $15,000 down. The balance of $70,000 accrued interest at the rate of nine percent per annum.

The contract required…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Lytle v. Payette-Oregon Slope Irrigation DistrictOregon Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Kintigh v. ElliottOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Daly v. FitchCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. Burt & Gordon, P.C. (In Re Stein)District Court, D. Oregon · 1997
  2. Matter of Marriage of ProctorCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API