Legal Opinion

Stringer v. Mitchell (In Re Stein)

United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Oregon

Decided April 20, 2001No. 19-30744PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

AMENDED MEMORANDUM OPINION

RANDALL L. DUNN, Bankruptcy Judge.

In this adversary proceeding, the plaintiffs, Douglas Stringer and Norman Sepe-nuk, P.C. (the “Plaintiffs”), seek to enforce an alleged security interest to the extent of $150,000 plus interest in certain funds (the “Fund”) held by John H. Mitchell (the “Trustee”) for the chapter 7 bankruptcy estate of Alexander V. Stein (“Stein”). Following the trial held on January 22, 2001, I have reviewed my notes, the exhibits, and the pleadings and other submissions in the file. I also have read applicable legal authorities, both as cited to me…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. In Re Pacific Express, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  2. R. Anthony Dubay v. Everette H. Williams, Everette H. Williams v. Rose City Development Co., Inc., Robert J. Davis v. Everette H. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
  3. Community Bank v. JonesOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Wootton v. Ravkind (In Re Dixon)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas · 1992
  5. In Re Softalk Publishing Co., Inc., Debtor. The Webb Company, a Minnesota Corporation v. First City BankCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In Re MayeauxUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Texas · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API