Legal Opinion
LaBore v. Muth
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided July 24, 1991No. 17318PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AMUNDSON, Justice.
Emily LaBore (LaBore) appeals from a circuit court decision affirming a no probable cause determination issued by the State Division of Human Rights, Department of Commerce and Regulation (Department) in response to her charge of discrimination against Michael C. Muth (Muth) and Sylvester’s Inc. (Sylvester’s). We affirm.
FACTS
The facts of this case are undisputed. In May, 1989, LaBore initiated a civil action alleging a claim of defamation of character (slander) against Candyce Lehr and Lisa Stenvold, both whom were employees of Sylvester’s. Sylvester’s is a bar and…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Regents of the University of California v. BakkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Permann v. South Dakota Department of Labor, Unemployment Insurance DivisionSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
- Petition of Famous Brands, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
- Jerry M. BLUM, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GULF OIL CORPORATION, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
- Oahe Conservancy Subdistrict v. JanklowSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Zoss v. SchaefersSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
- Weller v. Spring Creek Resort, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
- In Re the Expungement of Records Related to OliverSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
- Argus Leader v. HagenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
- Olson, Blake, Massie v. Butte County CommissionSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.