Geduldig v. Aiello
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stewart
For almost 30 years California has administered a disability insurance system that pays benefits to persons in private employment who are temporarily unable to work because of disability not covered by workmen’s compensation. The appellees brought this action to challenge the constitutionality of a provision of the California program that, in defining “disability,” excludes from coverage certain disabilities resulting from pregnancy. Because the appellees sought to enjoin the enforcement of this state statute, a three-judge court was convened pursuant to 28 U. S. C. §§ 2281 and 2284.1 On *487the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Reed v. ReedSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Frontiero v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Jefferson v. HackneySupreme Court of the United States · 1972
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by492 opinions
- Weinberger v. SalfiSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Usery v. Turner Elkhorn Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- General Electric Co. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Bray v. Alexandria Women's Health ClinicSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- City of Los Angeles Department of Water v. ManhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
487 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.